Verdict up front: Zoxni Mining and Cloud Mining Hub are published under two different developer names — and their Play Store galleries show the same application, down to an identical balance of 0.00000000722738001 printed in both. One is blue. One is purple. That is the difference.
Zoxni Mining: Cloud Miner is published by Amartha Studio. On the day we checked it showed 4.8 stars from 2,030 reviews, 100,000+ downloads, and both ads and in-app purchases. It sits in the Tools category and was last updated on 22 April 2026.
The number that gives it away
Compare the two store galleries side by side, as the image at the top of this article does.
Cloud Mining Hub’s second panel shows a dashboard with a balance of 0.00000000722738001. Zoxni Mining’s first panel shows a dashboard with a balance of 0.00000000722738001.
That is seventeen decimal places, identical, in two listings by two companies. Marketing screenshots are made from a real build with real screen state. The same build produced both.
And the rest of the app matches
The balance is the clincher, but it is not the only match. Both galleries show:
- A Market screen with a “+100%!” computing-power boost card
- A My Miner screen with a Paid / Free toggle over a list of hashrate rows — 3.50 GH/s, 2.50 GH/s, 6.50 GH/s and the rest, in the same order
- A “Powerful Pack” offer screen, gift-box graphic, doubled hashrate, and a rounded Buy button
- The same stylised “B” logo mark — blue on one listing, purple on the other
Same screens, same order, same copy, same component layout. The colour palette was changed and the name on the door was changed.
Why an operator does this
Publishing one app twice under two identities is a survival strategy, not a marketing one.
Ratings do not transfer. If one listing is reported or pulled, the other keeps trading with an untouched score. Between them they occupy two slots in every search for “cloud mining”, and a user burned by the blue one has no way of recognising the purple one.
Cloud Mining Hub sits at 4.3 from 1,350 reviews with 50,000+ installs. Zoxni sits at 4.8 from 2,030 reviews with 100,000+. Between one app and its twin, that is roughly a hundred and fifty thousand installations.
What the listing claims to be
Zoxni’s description is written entirely in the language of enterprise software, and never once mentions earning anything:
From the store listing
“Zoxni Mining: Cloud Miner is a cloud resource management tool… It does not provide any financial services, including trading, investment advice, or asset management… Zoxni Mining does not guarantee any computing outcomes or potential returns.”
What its users think it is
Marquis Jones Jr., 4 September 2026 — a five-star review:
“Just made my first withdrawal just to see how it goes… I made a few cash outs of combined 7 cents and its legit. I got a few packages and if I plan it right I could have a lot of money by the end of the year. Can’t go wrong with trying to invest in myself.”
He has bought packages, withdrawn seven cents, used the word “invest”, and given five stars to a product whose own listing says it provides no financial services. Seven cents has bought the operator a five-star review and a customer planning his year around it.
The most endorsed review on the page, with twenty-seven people agreeing, is Watson Black’s, 2 August 2026:
“A complete waste of time. It’s just another way of getting you to watch ads for them. It doesn’t run in the background. Whenever I check it I have to log back in. It’s NOT a Mr Beast app and neither are the other apps that claim to be his.”
That last line is the second time we have found it. A reviewer on Cloud Mining Hub — the twin — said the same thing in May. Two reviewers, on two listings of the same app, both report it being advertised under a celebrity’s name.
The data panel, again
Zoxni declares “Data isn’t encrypted” and that it “may share Location, Personal info and 3 others with third parties”, alongside “No data collected”. Cloud Mining Hub’s panel says precisely the same things. Of course it does.
- Compare the store screenshots when two apps feel alike. Placeholder numbers and screen order give a shared build away.
- A near-perfect rating beside a top review calling it a waste of time tells you which one was earned.
- A tiny successful payout is a sales cost. Seven cents bought a five-star review.
- Uninstalling one of these does not protect you from the next. Note the screens, not the name.
- Check any celebrity endorsement on their own channels. It is never there.
If you have bought packages in either app
Request a refund through Google Play while the purchases are recent, and check the Subscriptions screen for anything recurring. Do not buy a bigger pack to reach a payout. Screenshot your purchase history, balance and withdrawal screen before anything changes, and report it at IC3.gov. Report both listings with the “Flag as inappropriate” link — duplicate apps under separate developer identities are the specific thing Play is meant to act on.
